Radon

Radon is a colorless, odorless, tasteless radioactive gas that seeps up out of the ground and can build up inside homes without anyone noticing. You cannot see it, smell it, or taste it — and yet it is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking, and the number-one cause among people who have never smoked. The good news is that radon is one of the few serious environmental health hazards you can test for cheaply and fix reliably. This page explains, in plain language, what radon is, why it harms the lungs, how it gets into houses, how to test for it, and how to lower it if your levels are high.

What Radon Is
Why Radon Is Dangerous
Radon and Lung Cancer: The Numbers
How Radon Gets Into Homes
Radon in Well Water
Testing Your Home
Fixing a Radon Problem
Practical Steps to Protect Your Family
Research Papers
Connections
Featured Videos

What Radon Is

Radon is a naturally occurring chemical element — a noble gas, like helium or neon, which means it does not easily react with other substances or bind into materials. But unlike those harmless gases, radon is radioactive: its atoms are unstable and break down, giving off radiation as they do.

Radon is not manufactured and is not a pollutant that anyone releases on purpose. It is produced continuously in the ground by the slow, natural decay of uranium, an element found in trace amounts in nearly all soil and rock across the planet. The chain runs from uranium to radium and then to radon. Because uranium is everywhere in the earth's crust, small amounts of radon are seeping upward almost everywhere, all the time.

The specific form that matters for indoor air is radon-222. Its atoms are short-lived — each one breaks down within days — but because the soil keeps producing fresh radon, there is a steady supply. Outdoors, this radon simply mixes into the open air and is diluted to harmless levels. The problem begins only when radon has somewhere enclosed to collect: the inside of a building.

A few key points to hold onto:

Radon comes from nature, not industry — it rises from the soil and rock beneath and around a building.
It is a gas, so it moves freely through soil, cracks, and air.
You have no way to sense it — no color, no smell, no taste, no irritation. The only way to know your level is to test.
Radon levels are highly local: they depend on the geology directly under a specific building, so two houses on the same street — even next door to each other — can have very different levels.

Why Radon Is Dangerous

Radon's danger is not really about the gas itself — it is about what radon turns into and where those pieces end up.

When a radon atom decays, it produces a cascade of new radioactive particles known as radon decay products (older texts call them radon "daughters" or "progeny"). Two of the most important are radioactive forms of polonium. Unlike radon gas, these decay products are tiny solid particles, and they are electrically charged, so they stick to specks of dust and other fine particles floating in the air.

Here is the crucial step: when you breathe that air, these radioactive specks lodge in the lining of your lungs and airways instead of being breathed back out. Once stuck there, they continue to decay, and as they do they fire off a particularly damaging kind of radiation called an alpha particle.

Alpha radiation is worth understanding, because it explains why radon is hazardous in a way that background radiation from, say, a distant source is not:

Alpha particles are heavy and highly energetic but travel only a very short distance. They cannot even pass through a sheet of paper or the outer layer of your skin, which is why radon in the open air outside is not a concern.
But when an alpha-emitting particle is stuck right against the delicate cells lining your lungs, that short range becomes the danger. All of its energy is dumped directly into a tiny cluster of living cells at point-blank range.
That concentrated blast can break the DNA inside those cells. Most of the time the damage is repaired or the cell simply dies. But occasionally a cell survives with its DNA scrambled in a way that lets it grow out of control — the first step toward cancer.

Repeat that process over many years of breathing radon-laden air in a home, and the odds of one of those damaged cells eventually becoming a lung tumor add up. This is why radon exposure is a long-term, cumulative risk rather than something that makes you feel sick right away. Radon does not cause coughing, headaches, or any short-term symptoms. Its only well-established health effect in humans is lung cancer, appearing years or decades after exposure.

Radon and Lung Cancer: The Numbers

The link between radon and lung cancer is not a hypothesis — it is one of the best-documented environmental cancer risks we have. It was first recognized in underground miners, especially uranium miners, who breathed high concentrations of radon underground and developed lung cancer at strikingly elevated rates. Later, large studies pooling data from thousands of ordinary households confirmed that the far lower levels found in homes also raise risk (see Research Papers).

The headline facts, drawn from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO):

Radon is the second-leading cause of lung cancer overall, behind cigarette smoking.
Among people who have never smoked, radon is believed to be the leading cause of lung cancer.
The EPA estimates that radon is responsible for about 21,000 lung cancer deaths each year in the United States alone.
The WHO estimates that, depending on a country's average radon levels and how common smoking is, radon contributes to roughly 3 to 14 percent of all lung cancers.

There is one more piece that is genuinely important, especially if you or someone in your household smokes. Radon and tobacco smoke do not just add together — they multiply each other's effect. This is called a synergistic, or multiplicative, interaction. A smoker who is also exposed to high radon has a dramatically higher lung cancer risk than you would get by simply adding the two risks up. Put plainly:

For a non-smoker, high household radon carries a real but relatively modest lifetime lung cancer risk.
For a current smoker, that same radon level carries a far larger risk, because the two hazards amplify one another.
This means fixing a radon problem is valuable for everyone, but it is especially urgent in a home where anyone smokes — and it is one more powerful reason to quit.

It is worth being honest about scale here: the risk from radon builds over years of exposure, and not everyone with elevated radon will get lung cancer. But because the exposure is so common and so silent, the total number of deaths it causes is large — and, unlike most cancer risks, it is one you can measure and remove.

How Radon Gets Into Homes

Radon gas is constantly present in the soil beneath a building. Whether it becomes a problem indoors comes down to two things: how easily it can find a way in, and how much your house pulls it inward.

Your house acts like a gentle vacuum. Warm air rising inside a home, along with exhaust fans, clothes dryers, and fireplaces, tends to lower the air pressure in the lowest levels of the building slightly below the pressure in the soil outside. That small pressure difference literally draws soil gas — including radon — up and in through any available opening. This is why radon is usually highest in basements and ground-floor rooms and lower on upper floors.

The most common entry routes are:

Cracks in concrete floors and walls, especially in basements and slabs.
Construction joints where the floor meets the walls.
Gaps around pipes, wires, and utility lines that pass through the foundation.
Sump pits and drains that open directly to the soil or gravel below.
Crawl spaces with exposed earth or a dirt floor.
Well water in some homes (see the next section).

A stubborn myth is worth clearing up directly: any home can have a radon problem. It does not matter whether the house is old or brand new, drafty or tightly sealed, on a crawl space, a slab, or a full basement, or whether it has ever been tested before. A newer, energy-efficient home that is sealed up tight can actually trap radon more effectively than a leaky old one. Homes without basements are not exempt either. The only way to know your home's level is to test it — a neighbor's result, or a builder's assurance, is not a substitute.

Radon in Well Water

For most homes, radon comes up through the soil as a gas. But if your household water comes from a private well drilled into radon-bearing rock, water can be a second source. Radon dissolves into groundwater underground, and then it is released into the air of your home whenever you use that water — showering, running the dishwasher, doing laundry, or filling the sink. Agitating and heating the water drives the dissolved radon out into the room air, where you can breathe it.

A few things to keep this in perspective:

Radon from water is usually a smaller contributor to indoor air than radon seeping from the soil, but in some well-supplied homes it is significant.
Homes on a public/municipal water supply generally have little radon in their water, because the water is aerated and stored on its way to you, which lets the radon escape before it reaches your tap.
The primary health concern is still breathing the radon released into the air, not drinking the water — though there is a smaller, separate risk associated with ingestion.

If you have a private well and find elevated indoor radon, it is worth testing the water specifically. Water radon can be reduced with equipment installed on the water line (see Fixing a Radon Problem).

Testing Your Home

Because you cannot sense radon, testing is the only way to know your level — and it is refreshingly simple and inexpensive. Testing is measured in units of radioactivity per volume of air: in the United States, picocuries per liter (pCi/L); in most other countries, becquerels per cubic meter (Bq/m³). The two are just different scales for the same thing — 1 pCi/L is about 37 Bq/m³.

There are two broad kinds of do-it-yourself test kit, both widely available online, at hardware stores, or sometimes free or discounted through state radon programs:

Short-term tests stay in place for anywhere from about 2 to 90 days (often just a few days). Common types include charcoal canisters and electret detectors. They are the fastest way to get an initial reading — useful when you need an answer quickly, such as during a home sale.
Long-term tests remain in place for more than 90 days, typically using an "alpha-track" detector. Because radon levels swing with the seasons, weather, and how a house is used, a long-term test gives a more reliable picture of your year-round average exposure — which is what actually matters for health.

Practical tips for testing well:

Test the lowest level of your home that you regularly use — a finished basement, or the ground floor if you do not have one.
Follow the kit's instructions on keeping doors and windows mostly closed during a short-term test.
If a quick short-term test comes back high, confirm it with a second test (ideally a long-term one) before spending money on a fix.
You can also hire a qualified radon professional to test, which is often recommended for real-estate transactions.

Now, the numbers that guide action. There is no completely "safe" level of radon — any exposure carries some risk, and the risk simply falls as the level falls. But agencies set practical thresholds:

The EPA action level is 4 pCi/L (about 148 Bq/m³). If your home tests at or above 4 pCi/L, the EPA recommends taking action to fix it.
The EPA further suggests that you consider fixing your home between 2 and 4 pCi/L, since risk still exists in that range.
The WHO recommends a lower reference level of 100 Bq/m³ (about 2.7 pCi/L), reflecting evidence that risk is measurable well below the older 4 pCi/L mark. Where 100 Bq/m³ cannot be achieved, WHO advises a level no higher than 300 Bq/m³.

The takeaway is not to fixate on a single magic number but to understand the direction: lower is better, and the closer you can get your indoor level to the low outdoor background, the smaller your risk.

Fixing a Radon Problem

Here is the genuinely reassuring part: a high radon level is a fixable problem. Radon reduction — called mitigation — is a well-established trade, and a properly installed system can usually bring even very high levels down below the action level, often by 90 percent or more.

The most common and effective approach is active soil (sub-slab) depressurization. The idea is simple and elegant:

A pipe is inserted through the foundation floor into the gravel or soil beneath the slab.
A quiet, continuously running fan draws radon-laden air out from under the house.
The pipe carries that gas up and vents it above the roofline, where it disperses harmlessly into the open air — before it ever enters your living space.

Because the fan keeps the pressure under the slab lower than the pressure inside the house, it reverses the "vacuum" effect and stops radon from being pulled indoors in the first place. Variations of this method are used for homes with crawl spaces (often by sealing the crawl space with a plastic membrane and venting beneath it) and different foundation types.

Other measures that help, usually in combination with an active system rather than on their own:

Sealing cracks and openings in the foundation. This is worthwhile and limits radon entry, but on its own it is generally not enough — it is used to make a depressurization system work better.
Improving ventilation, sometimes with a heat-recovery ventilator (HRV) that brings in fresh air without wasting heat.
For radon in well water, point-of-entry treatment on the water line — either an aeration system (which bubbles the radon out and vents it outside) or a granular activated carbon (GAC) filter — can remove radon before the water reaches your taps.

On cost: in the United States, a typical whole-home radon mitigation system runs roughly $800 to $2,500, with many households landing near the middle of that range — a modest, one-time expense against a lifelong reduction in cancer risk. Systems use very little electricity and need little maintenance beyond an occasional check of the monitor. It is best to hire a certified radon mitigation contractor; many states and national programs maintain lists of qualified professionals.

If you are building a new home, ask about radon-resistant new construction. Installing the basic pipe-and-vent framework during construction is far cheaper than retrofitting later, and it makes activating a full system trivial if a later test shows you need it.

Practical Steps to Protect Your Family

Radon is unusual among health hazards because the response to it is so clear and achievable. You do not need to change your diet, take a medication, or overhaul your lifestyle — you just need to measure and, if necessary, fix. A sensible plan:

Test your home. Buy an inexpensive kit or hire a professional. If you have never tested, this is the single most useful thing you can do. Check whether your state or local health department offers free or discounted kits.
Retest periodically and after major changes — a renovation, a new heating or ventilation system, converting a basement into living space, or buying a home.
Act if your level is elevated. At or above 4 pCi/L, arrange mitigation; between 2 and 4 pCi/L, seriously consider it. Confirm a high short-term result with a second test first.
Do not smoke, and keep your home smoke-free. Because radon and tobacco smoke multiply each other's risk, this is by far the most powerful thing a household can do to shrink the combined danger.
Test during a real-estate transaction. Whether buying or selling, a radon test is standard, cheap, and lets any problem be fixed as part of the deal.

The bottom line: radon is a serious, common, and completely invisible cause of lung cancer — but it is also one of the most preventable. A test kit costs about as much as a couple of takeout meals, and a fix costs about as much as a small home appliance. For that, you get to remove one of the leading causes of a deadly cancer from the place you spend most of your life. Few health decisions offer that kind of return.

Research Papers

Darby S, Hill D, Auvinen A, et al. Radon in homes and risk of lung cancer: collaborative analysis of individual data from 13 European case-control studies. BMJ. 2005;330(7485):223. doi:10.1136/bmj.38308.477650.63 — The landmark European pooled analysis of 13 studies (over 7,000 lung cancer cases) showing that risk rises with residential radon, in a straight-line fashion with no safe threshold.
Krewski D, Lubin JH, Zielinski JM, et al. Residential radon and risk of lung cancer: a combined analysis of 7 North American case-control studies. Epidemiology. 2005;16(2):137–145. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000152522.80261.e3 — The North American counterpart to the European pooling, reaching consistent conclusions and strengthening the case that home radon at ordinary levels causes lung cancer.
Lubin JH, Boice JD Jr. Lung cancer risk from residential radon: meta-analysis of eight epidemiologic studies. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1997;89(1):49–57. doi:10.1093/jnci/89.1.49 — An early meta-analysis whose findings agreed with projections from miner studies, helping establish that indoor radon is a genuine population-level hazard.
Torres-Durán M, Ruano-Ravina A, Parente-Lamelas I, et al. Lung cancer in never-smokers: a case-control study in a radon-prone area (Galicia, Spain). European Respiratory Journal. 2014;44(4):994–1001. doi:10.1183/09031936.00017114 — Direct evidence that residential radon raises lung cancer risk in people who have never smoked, underscoring radon as the leading cause among never-smokers.
Turner MC, Krewski D, Chen Y, Pope CA 3rd, Gapstur S, Thun MJ. Radon and lung cancer in the American Cancer Society cohort. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 2011;20(3):438–448. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1153 — A large prospective U.S. cohort linking higher county-level radon to increased lung cancer mortality.
Al-Zoughool M, Krewski D. Health effects of radon: a review of the literature. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 2009;85(1):57–69. doi:10.1080/09553000802635054 — A broad review of the biology and epidemiology of radon, including the alpha-radiation mechanism by which decay products damage lung tissue.
Gray A, Read S, McGale P, Darby S. Lung cancer deaths from indoor radon and the cost effectiveness and potential of policies to reduce them. BMJ. 2009;338:a3110. doi:10.1136/bmj.a3110 — Estimates the substantial radon-attributable death toll and shows that testing and mitigation policies are cost-effective, while highlighting the multiplicative interaction with smoking.
Pawel DJ, Puskin JS. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's assessment of risks from indoor radon. Health Physics. 2004;87(1):68–74. doi:10.1097/00004032-200407000-00008 — The technical basis for the EPA's widely cited estimate of roughly 21,000 radon-related lung cancer deaths per year in the United States.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A Citizen's Guide to Radon: The Guide to Protecting Yourself and Your Family from Radon. EPA 402/K-12/002. epa.gov/radon — The EPA's plain-language homeowner guide covering the 4 pCi/L action level, how to test, and how to fix a radon problem.
World Health Organization. WHO Handbook on Indoor Radon: A Public Health Perspective. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. who.int — The WHO's global public-health assessment, source of the 100 Bq/m³ reference level and the estimate that radon causes 3–14% of lung cancers.

Back to Table of Contents

Connections